Ethics in Leadership Assignment Help

Description
Case Study
Due December 21
Case Studies
Briefly answer to each question in the case studies below. Once each question has been answered, in a two-page paper, select only one case study and analyze question 4. This will require an in-depth look at the facts of the case study and any outside research deemed appropriate to support your position.
Case Study 4.1
Crimes Against Humanity in the Hermit State
Analysis
Kim Jong-un is the leader of highly secretive North Korea. Since he took power in 2011, he has continued the same harsh regime that his father and grandfather fostered. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is known for its Stalinist principles and oppressive way of life. The country has endured seasons of widespread malnutrition and starvation, public executions, labor camps, and secret prison camps.
Their isolation tactics have coined DPRK as “the Hermit State.” The UN has encouraged other countries to enforce greater sanctions against North Korea because of its “systematic, widespread, and gross violations of human rights,” which they have constituted as “crimes against humanity.”
In a democratic nation, it is hard to imagine a world without freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or even basic freedoms in everyday life. However, that is commonplace within North Korea. The level of evil that is projected by Kim Jong-un can be hard to explain. It may be sourced from internal motivations as a dreadful pleasure or also because of the exclusion his family has long fostered. Either way, the evil that is promoted through North Korea is happening in our modern time.
Discussion
1. Can you think of other nations who actively deny human rights and commit crimes against their people?
2. Should the international community provide food aid to North Korea if it is likely to divert the food to the military and to government officials, as it has in the past?
3. What faces of evil do you see reflected in this case?
4. Should the United States risk its relationship with China to stop the murder and human rights violations in North Korea?
Case Study 4.2:
Poisoning Flint, Michigan
Analysis
Flint, Michigan, came under the spotlight in 2014 because it was revealed that their water contained toxic levels of chloride and lead from the Flint River. The water was sickening the community at an alarming rate. People were breaking out in rashes, suffering forms of pneumonia, and suffering other horrible miseries including death. When the issue was brought to light, leadership struggled to solve the problem and prolonged the situation while people continued to suffer.
Michigan’s Governor Synder eventually pledged $28 million toward the situation, but his actions were considered a little too late. Administrative evil was definitely in action where the marginalized community of people were neglected when leadership continued to carry out their duties as assigned. People wanted to point the blame to one person or one group when in reality there were a handful of groups who failed to adequately respond to the urgent needs of the Flint community. Was it a local, state, or federal problem?
Discussion
1. Is this a case of administrative evil in action? Why or why not?
2. How much blame should the governor accept for the crisis? Would that be for current health issues or for their lifetime? Who would be responsible for those health expenses—the local, state, or federal level?
3. Should governors be able to appoint emergency managers who have the power to override the decisions of local elected officials?
4. Do you think that the residents of Flint were treated differently because they are poor and African American? If Flint, Michigan, was a wealthy African American community, would there have been a faster response rate from government officials?”
Case Study 4.3:
Subway’s Spokesman Nightmare
Analysis
Jared Fogle lost over 200 pounds by choosing to eat Subway sandwiches as a college student. Over 15 years, he became a familiar face promoting the sandwich fast-food chain. The Subway organization doubled its revenue in this time frame.
Investigators later found that Fogle and his foundation director were secretly indulging in child pornography and sexual favors with prostitutes. In his plea deal, he agreed to pay $100,000 to each of his victims and received over 15 years in prison as a registered sex offender. Plus, it was discovered that his foundation, the Jared Foundation, never issued one of the grants as promised from the $2 million originally pledged to various schools and organizations.
The question can be posed as to who was truly responsible for the “celebrity-like” falling—Fogle or Subway? Subway immediately cut ties with Fogle, and he took full responsibility for his actions claiming that Subway did not know of his secret addictive pursuits. The relationship between Fogle, the foundation, and Subway probably could have undergone a better process. Aspects of the forgiveness process could have been pursued. Overall, Fogle claimed responsibility, and Subway seemed more concerned about protecting its own image.
Discussion
1. What is your reaction to Subway’s handling of this scandal?
2. Does Subway have any responsibility to Fogle’s victims?
3. Should Subway express remorse for Fogle’s crimes?
4. Should Subway take on childhood sexual abuse as a corporate cause? Would this be seen as an admission of guilt?

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Open chat
1
You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp! Via + 1 3234125597

Feel free to ask questions, clarifications, or discounts available when placing an order.

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code GIFT